September
24-27, 2007
• Renaissance Waverly Hotel
•Atlanta, Georgia USA
Flame Retardants
Wednesday,
September 26
9:00 a.m.—12:00 p.m.
Moderator: D.V. Parikh, SRRC-USDA
Wash Durable Flame Retardants
Ronald Dombrowski, TechTex Solutions,
Inc.
- Review of the wash durable flame
retardants used in textiles.
- Methods to identify them, methods
of application and what problems
they present to nonwovens.
[Open
Abstract] [Close
Abstract]
A review of the wash durable flame retards used in textiles, identify them,
explain methods of application, and what problems do they present to nonwovens.
Flame Retardant (FR) Nonwovens From Cotton-based Compositions
M.G. Kamath, University of Tennessee
- Cost-effective way to meet new legislative standards by incorporating different
fibers, binders or treatments with cotton fibers.
[Open
Abstract] [Close
Abstract]
There is an increasing interest for Flame Retardant (FR) nonwovens, especially
due to recent legislations and market trends wherein the upholstered furniture
and bedding products are required to pass the standard open flame test. Presently
this standard is active in California, and there is a proposal to extend across
the country soon. In this regard, we are developing cotton based nonwovens
for bedding products with flame retardant properties by blending cotton with
other commercially available fibers, binders, followed by chemical treatments,
offering a cost-effective way to meet the upcoming federal mattress flammability
standard. This research explores the opportunities to take advantage of possible
synergistic effects to achieve maximum performance.
Biodegradability of Environmentally Benign FR Natural Fiber Nonwoven Composites
Ioan Negulescu, Louisiana State University
- Composites made from natural fibers and bio-based polymers created and treated
with FR formulas.
- Characteristics evaluated as composites degraded over time; results shared.
[Open
Abstract] [Close
Abstract]
Nonwoven composites were prepared from bagasse and cotton fibers in blends with a series of biobased polymers, such as cellulose (in-house made lyocell), commercial poly(lactic acid) and poly(hydroxy butyrate). Citrate esters were used to plasticize and lower the processing temperature of bio-polyesters. Depending on the ratio between the fibers and mechanical stabilizers the materials were classified as polymer-stabilized nonwoven composites or fiber-reinforced polymer boards. Durable and non-durable fire retardant (FR) formulations were applied to compositions containing bioderived polyesters. Fire retarding efficiency was evaluated from the value of the oxygen index. Anaerobic degradation of composite nonwovens was assessed based on the evolution of methane and carbon dioxide gases, spectral (FTIR) and thermal data (DSC, TGA), morphology (microscopy) and mechanical strength at different time periods after submission to bio-degradative conditions.
Multi-component Flame Retardant Systems for Cotton Fabrics
Gerald Keep, Missing Octave Insights, Inc.
- Cost-effective intumescent flame retardant protection utilizing watersoluble
flame retardants.
[Open
Abstract] [Close
Abstract]
Intumescent foaming action is achieved in cotton fabrics, using A-B paired,
emulsified topical applications containing fire retardant components. The
A emulsion holds an acid, the B emulsion a base, which after applying, will react
and foam when exposure to flame temperatures. In a further embodiment,
the A portion may be able to utilize water-soluble flame retardants such as Boric
Acid and still result in a system semi-durable to home laundering. Different
architectures are used to meet differing FR needs in a cost-effective manner.
Flame Retardant Chemical
Mechanisms, Standards &
Applications
John Phifer, Apexical, Inc.
- Chemical reaction mechanisms for
various classes of flame retardants
are presented and their relative
uses on nonwoven fabrics are
discussed along with an overview of
regulations and standards.
[Open
Abstract] [Close
Abstract]
Chemical reaction mechanisms for various classes of flame retardants are presented
and their uses relative to nonwoven fibers and fabrics are discussed along with
an overview of regulations and standards. A flame retardant’s action
upon the burning combustion cycle generally requires the interruption of some
aspect of the chemical reaction mechanism involved. These mechanisms can
be in the solid or gaseous phase or have an endothermic (cooling) effect on the
system by absorbing or consuming heat during the pyrolytic decomposition. Flame
retardants do not generally improve material properties, but ensure high fire
safety levels. Fire safety is required in many applications. Products used
for building/construction, transportation, electrical/electronics, textiles and
furniture all have specific requirements for fire control. In particular,
it is apparent there is a significant overlap with respect to the broad use of
textiles and nonwovens as components in these other applications. Fire
regulations and tests are increasingly international and more stringent. Notable
US standards have been developed by the US Consumer Product Safety Commission
(CPSC) and California as regulations and Technical Bulletins, the National Fire
Protection Association (NFPA), Underwriters Laboratory (UL), and American
Society of Testing and Materials (ASTM). Internationally, the various members
of the European Union harmonized their regulations under the auspices of the
EC Commission in 2005 and reissued new EN standards for products and the International
Organization for Standardization (ISO) for testing. In the rest of the
world, many nations assure their testing procedures and standards are in compliance
with the EN and ISO standards.
