September
24-27, 2007
• Renaissance Waverly Hotel
•Atlanta, Georgia USA
Insulation II &
Panel Discussion
Tuesday, September 25
2:30 p.m.—6:00 p.m.
Moderator: Scott Miller, Knauf Insulation
Formaldehyde: An Assessment of
Dose, Mode-of-Action, and Risk
Stewart Holm, Georgia-Pacific
Corporation
- An examination of the literature
on formaldehyde, new scientific
information on formaldehyde and
observed dosing effects.
[Open
Abstract] [Close
Abstract]
Risk is defined as the probability to cause harm. Current assessments
utilize the dose where noted observations or “hazard” occurs and
determine a concentration-specific “risk” based either on generic
statistics-based modeling using the assumption of a linear dose response or on
known mode-of-action (MOA) principles. However, the practice of risk assessment
and the assumptions inherent within an assessment can be confusing to the general
public. Often a hazard is confused with a risk and chemical or product
deselection may subsequently result. Consequently, the question should
be asked if a chemicals’ MOA is unknown should a predicted concentration
be considered a “risk” or simply an “uncertainty.” For
formaldehyde, animal studies used to determine carcinogenic potential have reported
that no tumors are produced other than what occur at the site of administration,
i.e., nasal cancer in rats following inhalation exposure to sufficient doses
of formaldehyde. This only happens at doses that kill cells and cause mutations
in less injured cells which can then divide leading to the formation of tumors. The
current cancer risk assessment generated by EPA predicts excess risk at levels
below naturally occurring formaldehyde concentrations detected in rural ambient
air. Such a dichotomy does not appear to be supported by the science. Or
does it?
Many other data are available for formaldehyde in rodents and humans that
are instructive in completing an MOA. Is there a wide concentration range
by which these endpoints are recognized or do the effects related to formaldehyde
exposure occur in a narrow concentration band?
This paper will examine the historic literature on formaldehyde, present new
scientific information on the chemical conducted both in the US and the EU and
will examine the dose at which effects are observed and how these relate to the
MOA.
Understanding the Formaldehyde Emission Impact of Fiber Glass Insulation
Batts on the Indoor Environment
Scott Miller, Knauf Insulation
- IEQ model used to predict concentrations over time.
- Typical construction
timeline correlated to depict de minimis impact of insulation on
formaldehyde exposure.
[Open
Abstract] [Close
Abstract]
This paper will examine the modeling of the small chamber formaldehyde emission
profile of fiberglass batt insulation on the indoor environmental quality of
a typical residence. By placing fiber glass in series with other construction
materials the impact is demonstrated to have a deminimis affect on indoor formaldehyde
concentrations. The VERSAR model for predicting formaldehyde emission is utilized
to predict concentrations over time. The typical building construction schedule
is examined and correlated to depict the deminimis impact of insulation on formaldehyde
exposure.
Evaluating Life Cycle Impacts
of Nonwovens: Results, Lessons,
and Prospects from Case Studies
of Insulation
Pascal Lesage, Harvard School of Public
Health
- A summary of studies examining the
practical methods designers can use
(technology) to redesign products
(at any stage of development) for
economic, environmental and public
health benefits.
[Open
Abstract] [Close
Abstract]
Most of the environmental impacts that occur stem from the life cycles of
goods and services. These life cycles span the full chain of processes from raw
materials acquisition through primary and secondary manufacturing, transportation
of inputs to and from production, product installation, use, and maintenance;
and finally, end-of-life. Wastes, pollution, resource depletion, and their
negative consequences, at any point in the life cycle, represent an un-discovered
resource. For example, energy use leads to emissions that lead to human
mortality and morbidity, climate change, and so-on. Its use signals the possibility
for cost-effective measures that can reduce it. An under-appreciated (and under-utilized)
fact is that designers at any stage of any product life cycle have the ability
to make changes which can harness some of these ubiquitous resources, for economic,
environmental, and public health benefit. A series of case studies by the Harvard
School of Public Health has estimated the public health and economic and environmental
impacts of cost-effective residential insulation in the US. Results indicate
that cost-effective measures have the potential to avoid, over a 50-year period,
on the order of two million life-years worth of public health damages. This presentation
will summarize the findings, describe the analysis methods, and illustrate in
practical terms how designers at any point in product life cycles can make increasingly
efficient use of emerging databases to do these analyses themselves, and re-design
for economic, environmental, and public health benefit.
Sustainability
Scott Miller, Knauf Insulation, moderates
a panel that considers questions
surrounding sustainability issues:
Panelists:
- Scott Miller, Knauf Insulation
- Gregory Norris, Sylvatica
- Andrea Russell, Rio Tinto Minerals
- Gale Tedhams, Owens Corning

